My Position

I’m not interested in agility as a label. And I don’t explain frameworks. What interests me is a more fundamental question:

How do work systems actually learn?

Not in meetings. Not through planning. But at the point where real work meets real feedback. It always comes down to a cycle that must be closed.

Learning Is Not an Insight Problem

A system does not learn because it understands something. It only learns when work creates an observable reaction from reality and that feedback flows back into the next decision.

Anything that stretches, distorts, or interrupts this path prevents learning — even if it feels reasonable. That’s not intuitive. I get that.

My Focus

I focus on the real Work–Feedback Loop:

  • Where does work turn into actual impact?
  • Where does feedback arrive too late?
  • Where do organizations believe they are learning — but aren’t?

Anything that measurably shortens this cycle between work and insight increases learning capability. Everything else is overhead and can be ignored.

What I Write Against

I don’t write against Scrum. Not against Agile. Not against methods, roles, or tools. When applied well, all of them have their place. What doesn’t?

I write against decoupled systems where cause and effect are separated in time or organization.

Systems where work happens, but feedback arrives too late, filtered, or without consequences.

No learning happens there. Only activity.

What You’ll Find Here — and What You Won’t

You’ll find:

  • Diagnoses of delayed learning
  • Concrete questions that expose blind spots
  • Interventions and actions that reconnect work and feedback

You will not find:

  • Framework introductions
  • Method comparisons
  • Mindset appeals
  • Coaching promises
  • Maturity models

Not because these things are bad, but because they only become relevant once real learning actually takes place. And too often, it doesn’t.

How I Write

I only publish texts that serve a clear purpose:

They shorten the thinking path between work and feedback.

Description alone isn’t enough. Insight without consequence doesn’t move anything forward.

That means precision matters more to me than reach. And clarity matters more than broad appeal.

Who This Is For

This page is for people who:

  • Carry responsibility for real work
  • Have to decide under uncertainty
  • Want to enable learning instead of simulating it

If you’re looking for recipes, this isn’t for you. But if you want to understand why work often doesn’t learn — and how to change that, you’re in the right place.

In Short

I focus on how work systems actually learn — by shortening the real, physical path between action and feedback.

Everything else is overhead.